https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1GlmOao6X9uoj1ItRs4Elukjwvo1dzAsd?usp=sharing

primeiro trimestre

9 junho

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScsZUqjiP4DDlcXcOYTZqgeZcdIrtp3w4PPnXOuGc1PrOwZOw/viewform?usp=sf_link

licao 2 junho

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf6JsKOkyWDIB8VWh7Uh2KCu4W2dQ931Oh7c296sTq-6nsF9w/viewform?usp=sf_link

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSeXsyYx-tcojnZfSWHZuhLgzh7sByIlGFRcHgOHxkpLxiashw/viewform?usp=sf_link

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdkBFVX_b3OU6gj3sp_Ooe5fQdStJZ7HbJVr8Og1UaX7mAj3g/viewform?usp=sf_link

https://joshreads.com/category/mother-goose-and-grimm/page/2/

1. “There was a tree in the yard”.

“There was nothing interesting in the movie”.

There was foi utilizado nas frases por qual motivo?:

2. Escreva duas frases com “there was” na forma negativa:

3. “uncomfortable” tem prefixação? Se sim , escreva qual é, e o que altera no significado original.

4. “Indignantly”, “angrily”, “softly”e“badly” tem um sufixo -ly que transforma as palavras originais para a função de:

5. Escreva 4 exemplos de frases no “Imperative”.Qual a função do Imperative?

6. Escreva 4 frases na interrogativa utilizando o “there to be”.

7.Escreva frases utilizando: there are - there will be - there was uma de cada:

8. Leia as perguntas que estão no Simple Present e responda de acordo

● Where do you study?

● What do you do every day?

● Do you have breakfast? Alone or with your family?

PROVA

AVALIAÇÃO MENSAL DE INGLÊS

Responda as questões 1 a 3 de acordo com o texto:

CHAPTER VII.

A MAD TEA-PARTY.

There was a table set out under a tree in

front of the house, and the March Hare and the

Hatter were having tea at it: a Dormouse was

sitting between them, fast asleep, and the other

two were using it as a cushion, resting their

elbows on it, and talking over its head. “Very

uncomfortable for the Dormouse,” thought Alice;“only, as it’s asleep, I suppose it doesn ’t mind.”

The table was a large one, but the three

were all crowded together at one corner of it :

“ No room ! No room !” they cried out when

they saw Alice coming. “ There ’s plenty of room!” said Alice indignantly, and she sat down

in a large arm-chair at one end of the table.

“Have some wine,” the March Hare said in

an encouraging tone.

Alice looked all round the table, but there

was nothing on it but tea. “I don’t see any

wine,” she remarked.

“There isn’t any,” said the March Hare.

“Then it wasn’t very civil of you to offer

it,” said Alice angrily.

“ It wasn’t very civil of you to sit down

without being invited,” said the March Hare.

1. “There was a table set out under a tree...” e “there was nothing on it but tea” there was foi utilizado:

a) para indicar haver (existir) algo ou não que faz parte importante da narrativa.

b) por que “there” é um pronome possessivo.

c) para indicar uma ação que ainda acontecerá

d) porém, é um elemento desnecessário para a compreensão da narrativa.

e) para indicar que havia uma mesa colocada por cima de uma árvore e que faltou chá.

2. Escolha as afirmações corretas para somar e assinale o valor total correto:

4 - uncomfortable tem prefixação “un-”.

6 - uncomfortable tem prefixação “un-” que indica algo que é confortável.

8 - “There was a table set out under a tree...” se fosse na negativa ficaria “There no a table set out…”

16 - “There was a table set out under a tree...” se fosse na negativa ficaria “There wasn’t (was not) a table set out…”

soma:____________________

a) 20

b) 4

c) 10

d) 24

3. Nas frases “said Alice indignantly” e “said Alice angrily.” indignantly e angrily tem um sufixo -ly que fazem as palavras:

a) terem a função de adjetivos qualificando Alice;

b) mudam o significado das palavras

c) São palavras que não existem.

d) não tem nada em comum.

e) mudam o gênero das palavras

(UNICAMP-adaptado) Para as questões 4 e 5, leia o texto abaixo.

Advice for new students from those who know (old students).

The first day of college I remember walking into my first class and running to the first seat I found, thinking everyone would be staring at me. I was a ball of nerves.

But nobody seemed to notice and then it hit me: The fact that nobody knew me meant nobody would judge, which, upon reflection, was what I was scared of the most. I told myself to let go. All along the year, I forced myself into situations that were uncomfortable for me – for example, auditioning for a dance piece. Believe it or not, that performance was a highlight of my freshman year.

My advice: challenge yourself to try something new, something you couldn’t have done in high school. – Ria Jagasia, Vanderbilt University,’18.(Adaptado de http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/02/ education /edlife/advice-for-new-students-from-those-who-know-old-students.html?ref=edlife.)

4.No primeiro dia de faculdade:

a) Ria ficou muito nervosa

b) Ria estava segura de si.

c) Ria desistiu e voltou para casa

d) Ria foi observada por todos.

e) Ria na verdade é uma professora.

5.Para lidar com a situação, a estratégia adotada foi deixar de se preocupar e:

a) não fazer nada além de estudar

b) fazer novos amigos.

c) tratou de fazer coisas que nunca fez antes, como dança.

d) abandonar o curso.

e) viver e um espaço confortável.

Leia este anúncio e responda questões 6 e 7:

The Future of Food

SCENARIO PLANNING TRAINING

In 2030…

Will there be food to eat?

Where will our food come from?

Will there be enough?

Using the global system as a backdrop, expert scenario practitioners will help you apply the methodology that systematically imagines multiple futures and their risks and opportunities...

START ONLINE!

THEN COME TO STANFORD UNIVERSITY

Application deadline AUGUST 3, 2015

Online content opens August 10, 2015

Onsite Immersion at

Stanford Sept.28-Oct.1, 2015

Apply now!

at WORLDVIEW.STANFORD.EDU

SPACE LIMITED TO 32 PARTICIPANTS

(Adaptado de Stanford Magazine, July/August 2015, p.3.)

O texto anuncia um curso curso on-line e presencial. Temos duas frases que estão no modo Imperativo para chamar a atenção do leitor:

Transcreva estas frases:

____________________________________________________________________________ 7. Converta as interrogativas em afirmativas (mantendo no mesmo tempo verbal):

Will there be food to eat?

______________________________________

Will there be enough?

______________________________________

8.Escolha entre there are - there will be - there was para completar corretamente cada frase - pode repetir uma delas:

a) Tomorrow __________________a meeting at 5 p.m..

b) ___________a very old table in my house.

c) ____________ some animals that eat vegetables only.

d) ____________ a time in the future that our lives should be in dangerous.

Leia o parágrafo a seguir e responda a questão 9.

De acordo com o parágrafo quanto tempo leva-se para uma primeira impressão? __________________________________________________________________________

10. Leia o texto que está no Simple Present e respondas as questões de acordo

1 Where does Alice study?

________________________.

2 What does she do every day?

_________________________.

3 Does Alice have breakfast alone?

____________________________.

4 What’s the name of her mother?

___________________________.

Books are not Nadia Konyk’s thing. Her mother, hoping to entice her, brings them home from the library, but Nadia rarely shows an interest.

Instead, like so many other teenagers, Nadia, 15, is addicted to the Internet. She regularly spends at least six hours a day in front of the computer here in this suburb southwest of Cleveland.

A slender, chatty blonde who wears black-framed plastic glasses, Nadia checks her e-mail and peruses myyearbook.com, a social networking site, reading messages or posting updates on her mood. She searches for music videos on YouTube and logs onto Gaia Online, a role-playing site where members fashion alternate identities as cutesy cartoon characters. But she spends most of her time on quizilla.com or fanfiction.net, reading and commenting on stories written by other users and based on books, television shows or movies.

Her mother, Deborah Konyk, would prefer that Nadia, who gets A’s and B’s at school, read books for a change. But at this point, Ms. Konyk said, “I’m just pleased that she reads something anymore.”

Children like Nadia lie at the heart of a passionate debate about just what it means to read in the digital age. The discussion is playing out among educational policy makers and reading experts around the world, and within groups like the National Council of Teachers of English and the International Reading Association.

Some traditionalists warn that digital reading is the intellectual equivalent of empty calories. Often, they argue, writers on the Internet employ a cryptic argot that vexes teachers and parents. Zigzagging through a cornucopia of words, pictures, video and sounds, they say, distracts more than strengthens readers. And many youths spend most of their time on the Internet playing games or sending instant messages, activities that involve minimal reading at best.

Last fall the National Endowment for the Arts issued a sobering report linking flat or declining national reading test scores among teenagers with the slump in the proportion of adolescents who said they read for fun.

According to Department of Education data cited in the report, just over a fifth of 17-year-olds said they read almost every day for fun in 2004, down from nearly a third in 1984. Nineteen percent of 17-year-olds said they never or hardly ever read for fun in 2004, up from 9 percent in 1984. (It was unclear whether they thought of what they did on the Internet as “reading.”)

Web proponents believe that strong readers on the Web may eventually surpass those who rely on books. Reading five Web sites, an op-ed article and a blog post or two, experts say, can be more enriching than reading one book.

Hunter Gaudet, 16, is more comfortable reading on a computer. CreditNicole Bengiveno/The New York Times

“It takes a long time to read a 400-page book,” said Mr. Spiro of Michigan State. “In a tenth of the time,” he said, the Internet allows a reader to “cover a lot more of the topic from different points of view.”

Zachary Sims, the Old Greenwich, Conn., teenager, often stays awake until 2 or 3 in the morning reading articles about technology or politics — his current passions — on up to 100 Web sites.

In the case of Hunter Gaudet, the Internet has helped him feel more comfortable with a new kind of reading. A varsity lacrosse player in Somers, Conn., Hunter has struggled most of his life to read. After learning he was dyslexic in the second grade, he was placed in special education classes and a tutor came to his home three hours a week. When he entered high school, he dropped the special education classes, but he still reads books only when forced, he said.

In a book, “they go through a lot of details that aren’t really needed,” Hunter said. “Online just gives you what you need, nothing more or less.”

When researching the 19th-century Chief Justice Roger B. Taney for one class, he typed Taney’s name into Google and scanned the Wikipedia entry and other biographical sites. Instead of reading an entire page, he would type in a search word like “college” to find Taney’s alma mater, assembling his information nugget by nugget.

Web junkies can occasionally be swept up in a book. After Nadia read Elie Wiesel’s Holocaust memoir “Night” in her freshman English class, Ms. Konyk brought home another Holocaust memoir, “I Have Lived a Thousand Years,” by Livia Bitton-Jackson.

Nadia was riveted by heartbreaking details of life in the concentration camps. “I was trying to imagine this and I was like, I can’t do this,” she said. “It was just so — wow.”

Hoping to keep up the momentum, Ms. Konyk brought home another book, “Silverboy,” a fantasy novel. Nadia made it through one chapter before she got engrossed in the Internet fan fiction again.

Why are YouTube stars so popular?

With millions of subscribers, top YouTubers such as Zoella have huge, passionate audiences. Here’s a handy guide to help you understand their popularity

Stuart Dredge

@stuartdredge

220

Comments

287

Zoella’s girl-next-door status is a key part of her appeal to fans. Photograph: Dominic Lipinski/PA

British vlogger Zoella has just reached the milestone of 10m subscribers to her main YouTube channel, but she has a long way to go to catch its most popular creator PewDiePie, who is about to pass 42m.

They’re just two of the most prominent YouTube stars. In October 2015, online-video tracking firm Tubular Labs reported that there were more than 17,000 YouTube channels with more than 100,000 subscribers, and nearly 1,500 with more than 1m.

How have these YouTubers become so popular? It can seem baffling to people outside their main viewing demographic: smartphone-toting “millennials” who spend as much time (if not more) watching shortform video online as they do traditional TV shows.

Yet the top YouTube stars aren’t just popular: they are genuinely influential figures for their young fans. A fact that entertainment industry magazine Variety has been confronting its readers with since 2014.

YouTube stars explain what YouTube is to them?

That year, it published a survey of 13-18 year-olds in the US conducted by Jeetendr Sehdev of the University of Southern California, asking them to rate the 10 most popular English-language YouTubers and 10 of the most popular traditional celebrities across a range of qualities representing “influence”.

YouTubers took the top five places in the resulting chart, with Smosh, the Fine Bros, PewDiePie, KSI and Ryan Higa deemed more influential than Paul Walker, Jennifer Lawrence, Katy Perry and other celebrities.

When Sehdev ran the same survey again in 2015, YouTubers took the top six slots, ahead of stars including Bruno Mars and Taylor Swift.

When Variety asked teens to compare the influence of YouTubers with traditional celebrities, the YouTubers prevailed. Photograph: Variety

The surveys provided some useful evidence on why the online stars are so popular.

“YouTubers were judged to be more engaging, extraordinary and relatable than mainstream stars, who were rated as being smarter and more reliable. In terms of sex appeal, the two types of celebs finished just about even,” explained Variety in 2014.

“Looking at survey comments and feedback, teens enjoy an intimate and authentic experience with YouTube celebrities, who aren’t subject to image strategies carefully orchestrated by PR pros. Teens also say they appreciate YouTube stars’ more candid sense of humour, lack of filter and risk-taking spirit, behaviours often curbed by Hollywood handlers.”

That’s one of the key things to understand about the popularity of YouTubers, if you’re struggling to see it in their content – for their fans, the contrast with stars from the world of music, film and television has been a big factor in their rise.

Their very ordinariness – their relatability – is what makes them so appealing. The “girl or boy next door” who is “just like us” is not an unusual trope in the entertainment world but on YouTube, it’s heightened.

Variety’s 2015 study suggested that teenagers’ emotional attachment to YouTube stars is “as much as seven times greater than that toward a traditional celebrity” for these reasons.

Many YouTube stars foster this sense of connection in the way they talk to their fans in videos, from the coming-out announcements of stars such as Connor Franta, Ingrid Nilsen and Shane Dawson to Zoella vlogging about her experience of anxiety attacks, or PewDiePie addressing speculation about his earnings.

There are technical aspects to this too. By necessity, vlogging started out as a format with a person talking into a webcam – and thus directly to the viewer – often close to the camera and filming in their bedroom.

It created a sense of intimacy, and one that many YouTube stars have tried to maintain even as they got better cameras and editing kit. But it even extends to how many of them address their audiences.

In December 2015, the Atlantic investigated the phenomenon that it dubbed “YouTube voice” – which relates to the linguistic characteristics shared by many top YouTube stars. It was parodied by the journalist Julie Beck, who wrote in the introduction to her article: “Hey guys! What’s up? It’s Julie. And today I want to talk about YouTube voice.”

The piece outlines how overstressed and long vowels; extra vowels inserted into words – “terraping” instead of “trapping” for example – and aspiration (audible breaths) are common to many popular YouTubers.

To non-fans, these tics can be irritating. The linguist Mark Liberman described them as an “intellectual used-car-salesman voice” akin to “high-energy sales pitches” or even a “carnival barker”.

But that’s another point about the popularity of YouTube’s stars: the way they divide fans from non-fans is a big part of their appeal too.

Music industry analyst Mark Mulligan explored exactly that idea in a blogpost in September 2015, explaining to labels why teenagers seemed to care more about YouTubers than musicians.

He suggested that teenagers struggle to “find music that they can own, that their mum and dad aren’t going to sing along to too” – but have realised that their parents probably won’t be quite as open to YouTubers.

“With no music subculture to cling to Generation Edge has instead gravitated to YouTube stars,” wrote Mulligan.

Generation Edge is one of the many phrases bandied around to describe “people younger than us” in recent years. See also: Generation X, Gen C and the ubiquitous “millennials.”

Mulligan wrote: “For those not in the target demographic, it can sometimes be difficult to grasp exactly what the creative value is of many YouTubers. But that generational inability to grasp the essence of YouTube talent is exactly the same dynamic that music always had when it was the spearhead for youth rebellion.

“A kid trying to explain to his mum why Stampy Does Minecraft is worth watching hours on end is simply a 21st century rerun of kids trying to convince their parents of the musical worth of Elvis, the Beatles, the Sex Pistols and so on. That is the entire point of a youth culture – older generations aren’t meant to get it,” he added.

To summarise, then: to their fans, YouTube stars feel more authentic and relatable than many traditional celebrities, and that’s something that is intrinsic to the videos they publish. The fact that this may annoy or baffle non-fans – parents in particular – is part of the appeal.

It may also be a pitfall in waiting, though, for any YouTubers whose fans perceive them to be drifting away from that authentic, relatable status.

Staying relatable when you’re earning a high six- or even seven-figure annual income is one challenge, albeit hardly unfamiliar from the traditional entertainment world. But there are other trends that could change the relationship some YouTubers have with their audiences.

Many are working more with brands to sponsor their videos, for example. The risk is less that fans think they’ve sold out – many YouTubers are refreshingly upfront about their reasons for taking the cash – and more that some may end up making bad branded videos that turn their viewers off.

One of Variety’s online influencers, the Fine Brothers, have been taking flak for another reason in early 2016: they attempted to trademark the word “react” and license out their reaction-video format to other creators.

Format licensing is standard practice in the television industry, but as the Fine Bros now know, it’s capable of sparking a backlash in the YouTube community. It also risks being seen as another step away from their roots.

In 2016, the distinction between YouTubers and traditional celebrities is becoming increasingly blurred, not least because the former are no longer flying below the radar of the mainstream media. Some will struggle to stay connected to their fans in that spotlight, but not all.

The key thing to understand about YouTube stars is that the content of their videos – whether it’s Let’s Play game commentaries, makeup tutorials or personal vlogs – is only one half of their appeal.

The connection to their audiences is the other: they have grown up with the tools to forge and strengthen that connection, and many will use that as their anchor to keep their feet on the ground.

Since you’re here...

... we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading and supporting The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism than ever before. And unlike many new organisations, we have chosen an approach that allows us to keep our journalism accessible to all, regardless of where they live or what they can afford. But we need your ongoing support to keep working as we do.

The Guardian will engage with the most critical issues of our time – from the escalating climate catastrophe to widespread inequality to the influence of big tech on our lives. At a time when factual information is a necessity, we believe that each of us, around the world, deserves access to accurate reporting with integrity at its heart.

Our editorial independence means we set our own agenda and voice our own opinions. Guardian journalism is free from commercial and political bias and not influenced by billionaire owners or shareholders. This means we can give a voice to those less heard, explore where others turn away, and rigorously challenge those in power.

We need your support to keep delivering quality journalism, to maintain our openness and to protect our precious independence. Every reader contribution, big or small, is so valuable. Support The Guardian from as little as £1 – and it only takes a minute. Thank you.